So functional blindness is the absence of form vision which in results in an inability to read/write/manoeuvre/orientate/recognise objects. The layman thinks it's 'no perception of light' but no. NO!
There are standards for blindness and visual impairment that
- allow us to evaluate the patient's elegibility for benefits/welfare rights.
- to get a measure of what the health and social services are required in the region
- for epidemiological studies
- 0 - normal - 6/6-6/18
- 1 - low vision -> visual impairment <6/18-6/60
- 2 - low vision -> severe visual impairment 6/60-3/60
- 3 - blind - <3/60-1/60>
- 4 - blind - <1/60-pol>
- 5 - blind - NPL
Severely sight impaired (blind)
- Below 3/60 - you would certify most people who have VA below that. If a patient has 1/18 without considerable restriction of visual field then don't certify. It's better to test vision at one metre as 1/18 is slightly better than 3/60.
- 3/60 but below 6/60 - certifty if fov is v constricted, don't certify if they've had a vf defect for a long time and isn't v contracted. EG Congenital nystagmus, albinism, myopia
- 6/60 or above - certify if vf v contracted esp in lower part of field. Don't certify if homonymous/bitemp hemianopia with central VA of 6/18
- 3/60-6/60 with full field
- Up to 6/24 Snellen w/moderate contraction of field, opacities in media or aphakia
- 6/18 or even better if there's a gross vfd eg hemianopia or marked contraction like in RP.
Final bunch of definitions
- Functionally blind - can't see to read or write even with LVAs and can't move in unfamiliar surrounding w/out cane, dog, sighted guide
- Functionally sighted - visually impaired but can read or identify stuff with LVA and can move in unfamiliar surroundings without dog/cane/sighted guide
- Functionally sighted w/aided mobility - can read etc but not move w/out dog/cane/guide. Example of this is someone with RP
- Functionally sighted w/out sighted literacy - can move in unf surroundings but can't see to read even with LVAs. Example of this is someone with ARMD