Sunday 22 March 2009

LV: Types of Telescope

Basic types
  • Hand held
  • Clip on
  • Spectacle mounted
  • Monocular versus binoc
  • Focus/Afocal
Specials
  • Autofocus
  • CL telescope
  • IOL lens scopes
  • BTLT - Behind the lens telescopes. These offer cosmetic adv but great care must be taken obvs. Increased risk of eye injury if the patient bumps into something while wearing them. Also v expensive
  • Bioptic - for px who fulfil certain requirements driving with bioptics is legal in some US states, not here. Px can resolve fine detail like road signs
Contact Lens Telescopes
  • These use a galilean system where the obj lens is a high plus spec lens and the eyepiece is a high powered -ve CL. The vertex dist of specs is equal to the sum of the focal lengths (length of the telescope)
  • The FOV is better than with a conventional telescope cos the exit pupil is really close to the eye but it also depends on the objective diameter (use a blended aspheric to avoid a ring scotoma)
  • Has many practical and cosmetic disadvantages though so is rarely used.
  • EG a +20DS spec lens and a -40DS contact lens. Px is emmetropic.
The fitting of
  • check that normal scope improves VA as expected
  • Check nystagmat for oscillopsia
  • Fit CL, maximise vd of trial frame, perform over-refraction
  • CL must be stable
  • Vergence amplification means separate reading specs are required
  • Account for uncorrected ametropia - +10D hypermetrope with -30CL effective eyepiece is -40 and -10 myope with -30 CL effective eyepiece is -20.
Advantages of
  • In theory px could drive under uk law if visual requirements were met
  • Can get acuity much better than expected in congenital nystagmus
  • IOL could be used instead of CL giving a longer vd so better magnification but IOL can't be changed if acuity worsens
Disadvantages of
  • Low magnification so only works for moderate acuity loss
  • Patient has to be adapted to CL wear & it's difficult to insert contact lenses
  • Need to wear the system regularly for long periods
  • Adaptation to spatial distortion required
  • Poor cosmesis with high vd and big fat plus lenses

No comments: